Octri
API StudioSDK StudioMonitoringMCP ServerFeatures
ComparePricingBlogDocs
Log inStart for free
Octri
API StudioSDK StudioMonitoringMCP ServerFeatures
ComparePricingBlogDocs
Log inStart for free
Blog/Comparisons
Comparisons·July 6, 2026·4 min read

Stainless Alternative: Migrate Your OpenAPI SDKs to Octri

Stainless wound down its hosted SDK generator in 2026. Octri is the all-in-one alternative: docs and SDKs in 10 languages from your OpenAPI spec, plus built-in monitoring. Migrate free.

#comparisons#stainless#migration#sdks

Stainless built some of the best SDK tooling developers had used. In May 2026 the team joined Anthropic and wound down the hosted generator. No new signups, no new projects. If you're reading this, you probably have an API that ran on it and a decision to make about what replaces it.

Octri is the obvious landing spot. Same core job: one OpenAPI spec in, a polished docs site and production-ready SDKs across 10 languages out. It also does the one thing Stainless never did. The SDKs monitor themselves in production.

Migrating from Stainless? We'll move your spec over personally during the beta, at no cost. Start free or email sales@octri.dev.

What actually changed with Stainless

  • New generation stopped. You can no longer create new SDKs or projects on the hosted platform.
  • Your existing SDKs are safe. Anything already generated is yours. Keep it, modify it, extend it however you like.
  • What you lose going forward: new SDK generation, automatic regeneration on spec changes, and hosted docs updates. Your published packages won't keep pace with your API on their own anymore.

If your API is still evolving, that last point is the problem. A frozen SDK drifts out of sync with your endpoints. The drift stays invisible until an integrator hits it.

Octri vs. Stainless (legacy) at a glance

Octri Stainless (legacy)
Docs + SDKs from one OpenAPI spec ✅ ✅
SDK languages 10 (TS, Python, Go, Rust + 6 more) 8
Regenerate + republish on every merge ✅ ✅ (while active)
Built-in production SDK monitoring ✅ de-minified stack traces, tagged to release ❌
AI-native docs (MCP server, llms.txt, ask-the-docs) ✅ Partial
Accepting new projects ✅ ❌ (wound down)
Starting price Free → $49/mo n/a

Migrate in three steps

  1. Point Octri at the same OpenAPI spec. The source of truth you already gave Stainless. No rewrite. Generating an SDK covers the upload, the two settings to check first, and the build.
  2. Pick your languages. Start with the ones you shipped before, add others anytime (+$50/mo each). All ten, with install instructions and per-language options.
  3. Connect GitHub. Every merged PR regenerates your docs and SDKs and republishes to npm, PyPI, crates.io, pkg.go.dev, and the rest. The automation you had, back again. See publishing.

That's the parity path. The upgrade comes free.

If you shaped your old SDKs with a config file, the equivalents live in SDK Studio: client shape for naming and namespacing, retries and timeouts, pagination, and authentication. Inside SDK Studio is the tour.

The thing Stainless never did: monitored SDKs

Once a generated SDK ships inside a customer's app, it's a black box. You don't know when it throws, on which endpoint, for which release. Octri closes that gap. Every SDK it generates reports its own production errors, de-minified and tagged to the exact release. Think of how Sentry works, except you never wire up Sentry. You upload source maps from CI with @octri/monitoring-cli, and the service pairs them on read so a minified production trace resolves back to your source.

In practice, you see which endpoints are breaking for real integrators, ranked by how often. You fix them before the support ticket lands. Migrating off Stainless is a good moment to pick that up, not just to rebuild what you already had.

Start at monitoring setup, which is a toggle and an SDK rebuild, then readable stack traces for the release-matching rule that makes traces resolve. Why generated SDKs break silently explains why we built it this way.

FAQ

Will my package names change? You choose your package names in Octri. If you want to keep publishing under the same names to the same registries, you can (subject to your registry ownership). See publishing for package names and registry connections, and note that Go and Swift publish by git tag rather than to a registry.

Is my existing Stainless-generated SDK still safe to use? Yes. You keep everything Stainless already generated. Octri handles your next generation and everything after it.

Can I keep auto-publishing on merge? Yes. Connect GitHub and Octri regenerates and republishes on every merged PR.

Do I have to turn on monitoring? No, it's opt-in. Your SDKs work fine with it off. We think you'll want it on. Setup is a toggle, then a rebuild so the telemetry config is compiled into your clients.

How much does it cost? Free to start (50 endpoints, 1 language, monitoring included), then $49 / $99 / $199. A fraction of enterprise SDK tooling.


Ready to migrate? Start free and you'll have regenerated, monitored SDKs from your spec in a couple of minutes. Prefer a hand? Email sales@octri.dev and we'll move it for you.

This reflects publicly available information as of July 2026, including Stainless's own announcements about its hosted generator. Details change, so check the source for the latest. Product names and marks belong to their respective owners; Octri is not affiliated with or endorsed by them.

← PreviousHow to Generate API Documentation from an OpenAPI Spec (2026 Guide)
Next →Octri vs. The Competition: Why We Win the API Toolchain (2026)

Related articles

Comparisons·6 min read

Octri vs. The Competition: Why We Win the API Toolchain (2026)

Speakeasy, Fern, and Mintlify each generate docs or SDKs and then stop. Octri is the only one we know of that keeps watching after the SDK ships, and the one we think you'd actually enjoy using. Here is the whole field, side by side.

July 7, 2026
Comparisons·4 min read

Octri vs. Fern: Docs & SDK Generation Compared (2026)

Fern and Octri both turn one API definition into docs and SDKs. Octri adds production monitoring Fern has no answer for, more languages including Rust, a nicer docs editor, and a free tier.

July 6, 2026
Comparisons·4 min read

Octri vs. Mintlify: Docs Platform vs. Docs + SDKs (2026)

Mintlify makes a docs site and stops there. It cannot generate a single SDK. Octri gives you docs that look just as good, plus first-party SDKs in 10 languages and production monitoring, from one OpenAPI spec.

July 6, 2026
Comparisons·4 min read

Octri vs. Speakeasy: SDK Generation Compared (2026)

Speakeasy is enterprise-priced and SDK-only, and you tune it through config. Octri is all-in-one, starts free, monitors your SDKs in production, and lets you customize every one in a real studio.

July 6, 2026

Ship notes, straight to your inbox

New SDK languages, changelog highlights, and the occasional deep-dive on docs that don't rot. About once a month. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Join developers keeping tabs on Octri.

Octri

Upload an OpenAPI spec. Get AI-generated docs and production-ready SDKs in 10 languages, live in minutes.

Product

  • API Studio
  • SDK Studio
  • Monitoring
  • MCP Server
  • Pricing
  • Compare
  • Blog
  • Changelog

Developers

  • Documentation
  • API Reference
  • SDK Libraries
  • MCP Server
  • Monitoring
  • CLI
  • Support

Legal

  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Fair Use Policy
  • Data Processing (DPA)
  • Cookie Policy
  • Security
  • Subprocessors

© 2026 Octri, LLC. All rights reserved.

Made by devs who got tired of hand-writing SDKs.